This essay Net Censorship has a total of 669 words and 3 pages.
Most of us have used it. Most of us find it useful, Some of us find it entertaining. Some of us
find it offensive.
“It” is the Internet. The Internet has dramatically changed our society. It brings together people
and their ideas from all around the world in a short amount of time. It is expanding daily to allow new
ideas and thought s to be transmitted quickly and easily with the single click of a button. One can find
information on almost any subject there. Yet many people are trying to censor it. The Internet contains
racist thoughts, sexually explicit material and much more inappropriate material. But who is it
inappropriate for and why should it be censored?
In 1996 the Communications Decency Amendment was passed by congress. This amendment
imposed a $100,000 fine or a 2-year jail term on anyone who used the Internet to annoy, abuse, threaten or
harass anyone else. Pro-censors believed the act to be necessary in order to extend the standards of
decency to the new telecommunications device. Anti-censors thought the amendment was acting like the
Recently though the Supreme Court overturned the Communications Decency Act in the civil case
of Reno v. ACLU. This new law states that the Internet deserves the same level of speech protection as
books or other printed material.
Even with this new law in effect many people are still trying and some are succeeding at censoring
the Internet. They are creating schemes to block and rate the net. A meeting recently took place at the
White House about this subject. Several industry leaders and the government agreed to try to originate a
variety of systems to block and regulate controversial online speech. Despite the Supreme Court these
leaders are inching toward the dangerous and incorrect understanding that the Internet is like television and
should be rated and/or censored.
During this meeting many announcements took place. Netscape, a major online server,
proclaimed their plans to join Microsoft, a major computer company, and adopt the Platform for Internet
Content Selection (PICS). PICS is a rating standard that established a consistent way to rate and block
online content. IBM also had an announcement: They have decided to make a $100,000 grant to
Recreational Software Advisory Council (RSAC), another rating system. They did this in hopes of
encouraging it’s use. Senator Patty Murray of New York announced of a proposed legislation that would
tax civil and ultimately criminal penalties on those who mis-rate a website.
What will be the result of all these actions? The Internet will become bland and homogenized.
The major commercial sites will still be readily available but those who circulate quirky and idiosyncratic
speech, those who create their own home pages or post to controversial news groups will be the first to be
blocked by filters and made invisible by the search engines. They will still be there but available only to
those with the know how and the tools.
Does this material deserve to be censored anyway? Internet users know best what they are looking
at. If it offends them, they should move on. The primary responsibility for determining what speech to
access and what speech not to access should remain up to the Internet user not filters.
Many parents have a problem with their children and the Internet. There are many suggestions
and ideas for controlling what they are viewing. The parents should also have they computer in a room
where they can look over the child’s shoulders every once in a while to check up on them. The parents
should put time restrictions on usage of the computer. There are many solutions to this problem.
In conclusion the Internet is a quickly growing addition to our culture., It informs, entertains and
can possible offend. But with the Supreme Court’s ruling, no one should be allowed to censor it. The
Internet is a never-ending worldwide conversation that deserves the highest protection from government
How George Carlin's Filthy Words Gave the Govern How George Carlin\'s Filthy Words Gave the Government the Power to Regulate What We Hear on the Radio The FCC v. Pacifica Foundation: GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS ON RADIO BROADCASTING In 1978 a radio station owned by Pacifica Foundation Broadcasting out of New York City was doing a program on contemporary attitudes toward the use of language. This broadcast occurred on a mid-afternoon weekday. Immediately before the broadcast the station announced a disclaimer telling listeners that the program wo
The Internet, Pornography, and ChildrenThe Internet, Pornography, and Children Why should anyone be concerned about pornography on the Internet? After all, this is a free country and everyone should have access to anything they want, right? This position would be true if only adults used the Internet; it can not be true when children also use the Internet. Most people would agree that children should not have access to Internet sites that are considered pornographic. Does that mean that children should not be allowed Internet access
CENSORSHIP ON THE INTERNETCENSORSHIP ON THE INTERNET A 43-year-old man from Boston was having a steamy cyber affair with who he thought to be a 23-year-old woman. He later found out the she, to his dismay, was an 80-year-old man living in a Miami nursing home. Things like this happen everyday, people mask their sex and age to avoid or attract attention on the Internet. This is only one of the reasons why the government wants to censor the Internet. They claim they want to ‘protect’ the children by limiting the amount o
Pornography DebatePornography Debate Suppose one accepts MacKinnon and Dworkin\'s suggested statutory definition of pornography. How does one who generally accepts MacKinnon and Dworkin\'s views on the pervasively harmful effect of pornography, and who accepts a need for legal redress of the harms perpetrated by pornography, deal with pornographic material? The ordinance proposed by MacKinnon and Dworkin would deal with such material by enacting legislation which gives people adversely affected by the works, whic
INTERNET REGULATION: POLICING CYBERSPACEINTERNET REGULATION: POLICING CYBERSPACE The Internet is a method of communication and a source of information that is becoming more popular among those who are interested in, and have the time to surf the information superhighway. The problem with this much information being accessible to this many people is that some of it is deemed inappropriate for minors. The government wants censorship, but a segment of the population does not. Legislative regulation of the Internet would be an appropriate
Computer, Internet, PrivacyComputer, Internet, Privacy INTERNET REGULATION: POLICING CYBERSPACE The Internet is a method of communication and a source of information that is becoming more popular among those who are interested in, and have the time to surf the information superhighway. The problem with this much information being accessible to this many people is that some of it is deemed inappropriate for minors. The government wants censorship, but a segment of the population does not. Legislative regulation of the Inte
PornographyPornography Suppose one accepts MacKinnon and Dworkin\'s suggested statutory definition of pornography. How does one who generally accepts MacKinnon and Dworkin\'s views on the pervasively harmful effect of pornography, and who accepts a need for legal redress of the harms perpetrated by pornography, deal with pornographic material? The ordinance proposed by MacKinnon and Dworkin would deal with such material by enacting legislation which gives people adversely affected by the works, which clear