This essay United States History has a total of 635 words and 5 pages.
United States History
"From 1790 to the 1870ís, state and national governments intervened in the American economy mainly to aid private economic interests and promote economic growth. Between 1890 and 1929, however, government intervention was designed primarily to curb and regulate private economic activity in the public interest."
Assess the validity of this statement, discussing for each of these periods at least TWO major areas of public economic policy.
The statement is essentially true, in the time of 1790 to 1870ís private business was at its peak, government and state did little to control or usually was in favor of big business. Laissez-faire was the common policy towards regulations and business dealings in general. However form 1890 and 1929 the attitudes changed, more people were concerned with the well being or the people, concerned with the ever growing power of big businesses; government and state started to regulate them in the very ways that the previous time period.
1. many businesses were free to do as they pleased
i. Carnegie Steel
2. monopolies were established
i. multimillion dollar industries were formed
a. Standard Oil
b. Carnegie Steel
ii. little done to regulate these "big businesses"
a. not until Sherman Anti-trust Act was there an attempt made to
1. even that didnít have teeth
3. with the monopolies prices can be fixed, nothing was done to stop this until the late
4. laissez-faire policies were favored at the time
b. business in general
1. conducted in the way the top 1% saw fit
i. Andrew Carnegie
ii. John D. Rockefeller
iii. J.P. Morgan
2. big business prospered while the small business owners were left to the mercy of the big guys
3. economy was based on the few people that had all the money
i. this resulted in many poor, few rich
ii. yet again government/state didnít do a thing till after the late 1800ís
4. strikes and unions illegal at the time
II. 1890 - 1929
1. Acts begin to show their teeth
i. Sherman Anti-Trust Act
ii. Interstate Commerce Act
2. Monopolies started to be broken up
i. "Trust Busters"
a. Teddy Roosevelt
b. Woodrow Wilson
ii. regulation of business more strict
3. People start to realize the evils of a laissez-faire economy
i. no one but big business would profit
4. old styles of thing are soon taken over by a new thinking
i. all people are important
ii. economy which was mainly directed towards the few wealth was now being directed towards the majority, not the minority
b. business in General
1. unions legal
2. per capita income rose from $450 to $567
3. even presidents view changed with the election of Roosevelt
i. " President was steward of the people"
ii. Hepburn Act
a. regulated RR
b. moved to rid laissez-faire
4. Corrupt business tactics reformed
i. Pure Food and Drug Act
a. to control the unscrupulous tactics of the big businesses and to help the conditions of life.
5. important people are more concerned with the poverty of the country
ii. some rich
6. policies changed towards rich being all important to a more conscious moralistic view of the people being important
In conclusion I believe that the economic policies during 1790 to 1870 were in fact set up to aid private interests of the few wealthy in the U.S. because of the ever prevalent growing wealth in individuals such as Rockefeller and Carnegie. Monopolies and securities grew without restraint in this time period. Things fundamental to the peoples needs were neglected, such as unions and price regulations Whereas in the 1890 to 1929 policies and views were shifted to a more central focus on the public interests and monopolies were starting to be toppled by "trust busters" and laws and regulations set against them such as the Sherman Anti-trust act and the Interstate Commerce Act which were first made effective with president Roosevelt.
Topics Related to United States History
Monopoly, Market structure, Competition law, Laissez-faire, Regulatory economics, Sherman Antitrust Act, Theodore Roosevelt, Andrew Carnegie, United States antitrust law
Essays Related to United States History
The MonopolyThe Monopoly a) Using Australian examples describe the characteristics of the two of the following forms: Monopoly Oligopoly The main characteristics of an oligopoly are: ∑ The market is dominated by only a few companies, which are relatively large. ∑ The production of identical products which are similar. ∑ There are significant barriers to entry. ∑ The interdependence of production decisions within the market. An Oligopoly market exists in which a small number of firms dominate the supply to a
Bank WarBank War Did the Bank War cause the Panic of 1837? Richard Hofstadter from The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It believes President Andrew Jacksonís refusal to recharter the Bank of the United States was politically popular but economically harmful to the long-term growth of the United States. Peter Tenim, from The Jacksonian Economy, believes international factors, such as changes in the monetary policies of the Bank of England, the supply of silver from Mexico, and the price
THE ROBBER BARONS OF THE 19TH CENTURYTHE ROBBER BARONS OF THE 19TH CENTURY Cornelius Vanderbuilt... ... an ill educated, ungrammatical, coarse, and ruthless, but clear-visioned man. He started his millions in the steamboat industry. As a young boy he went to work for a small steamboat owner, Thomas Gibbons. After learning how to operate a steamboat, he designed one and persuaded Gibbons to build it. Vanderbuilt\'s slogans of low prices for superior rates attracted many customers. But an unknown to the passengers was that the food a
Progressivism and its EffectsProgressivism and its Effects Progressivism was a period of American history in which improving working conditions, improving the way of life, exposing corruption, expanding democracy and making reforms was the main idea of this period. Many of the citizens granted and demanded a change in numerous areas such as business, labor, economy, consumers and an increase of democracy. The progressive period was marked with the arrival of three great presidents Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson all three of th
The New Age After the 1500sThe New Age After the 1500s After 1500 there were many signs that a new age of world history was beginning, for example the discovery of America and the first European enterprises in Asia. This new age was dominated by the astonishing success of one civilization among many, that of Europe. There was more and more continuous interconnection between events in all countries, but it is to be explained by European efforts. Europeans eventually became masters of the globe and they used their maste
Agrarian Discontent in the Late 1800's Agrarian Discontent in the Late 1800\'s Why the Farmers Were Wrong The period between 1880 and 1900 was a boom time for American politics. The country was for once free of the threat of war, and many of its citizens were living comfortably. However, as these two decades went by, the American farmer found it harder and harder to live comfortably. Crops such as cotton and wheat, once the bulwark of agriculture, were selling at prices so low that it was nearly impossible for farmers to make a pr
Industrial RevolutionIndustrial Revolution Corporate development during the Industrial Revolution was made in part by entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs were the people who took responsibility for the organization and operation of a new business venture. These business men often risked the initial money for setting up different types of businesses. With the risk of large sums of money, some of these entrepreneurs made enormous profits. Two major entrepreneurs of American history are John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie
Decline of the American Empire Decline of the American Empire In any era there are different protagonists, playing the same game on a similar board. Like a game of monopoly, there are nations competing to become the foremost leaders of their time. They amass great wealth, powerful armies, and political sway. When the influence and might of these countries transcends the confines of their boundaries, so that they become a presence throughout the world, they become empires. At times, it seems as though one of these empires win
Religion, and State SovereigntyReligion, and State Sovereignty The influence of religion on humankind can be traced back to the first records of history. Religion has served as a pillar of strength to some and binding chains to others. There are vast amounts of information and anthropological studies revealing the interaction of religion and humankind. However, for the purposes of this paper, the time periods of study will be broken up into three sections. Each section will give a general description of how religion affected
Marxism and Economic TheoryMarxism and Economic Theory Human relationships have always been dynamic. Change and adaptability have gone hand in hand with the passage of time for human society. Systems have been developed to regulate, direct and control the resources of this society. The systems are referred to as governments and the resources as the populace or inhabitants and forces of production. A government must be dynamic in its nature reflecting the change in society. At times these systems have resisted the necessit
Monopoly of the Postal ServiceMonopoly of the Postal Service In the United States economy most markets can be classified into four different markets structures. But, each and every market in the United States is completely unique from the others. Generally the best type of market structure for the general public is per-fect competition because it creates the lowest possible price for the public. There are some exceptions were perfect competition isnít the best choice for the public on account of various reasons. The United S
Corporate Development During the Industrial Revolu Corporate Development During the Industrial Revolution The Standard Oil Company founded by John D. Rockefeller and the U.S. Steel Company founded by Andrew Carnegie. The Standard Oil Company and U.S. Steel Company were made successful in different ways due to the actions of their different owners. The companies differed in their labor relations, market control, and structural organization. In the steel industry, Carnegie developed a system known as vertical integration. This means that he cut o
Postal Service As a Monopoly Postal Service As a Monopoly In the United States economy most markets can be classified into four different markets structures. But, each and every market in the United States is completely unique from the others. Generally the best type of market structure for the general public is per-fect competition because it creates the lowest possible price for the public. There are some exceptions were perfect competition isnít the best choice for the public on account of various reasons. The United St
Monopolies - A Case Study Monopolies - A Case Study John Velimirovic Monopolization And Its Implication On A World Scale The monopolization of the capitalist system is at the base, a degradation, not only of the free-competition of the capitalistic (bourgeoises) socio-economic order, it is also, the degradation of the working class and, in fact, the respective systems imminent demise. During the Cold War competition between potential monopolist nations, USA, France, Germany, England and Canada was highly minimized and
Why Is There Gravity?Why Is There Gravity? When you pick up a stone and release it falls to the ground. This seemingly simple concept has been known throughout history as gravitation. Isaac Newton managed to explain gravity in terms of its effects, but few have come up with a working explanation for the driving force behind it. The mysterious nature of some of the more peculiar effects of gravity, as well as the simple ones, indicate that explaining why there is gravity will be a long, difficult, yet intriguing task
ECONOMIC TRANSITION IN POLAND & RUSSIAECONOMIC TRANSITION IN POLAND & RUSSIA Since approximately 1988, Poland and the republic of Russia (formerly Soviet Union) have gone through major economic reform. The main emphasis of this paper is to identify the different approaches that the governments in these two countries have taken and to look at the positive and negative effects that these drastic changes have had on their economies. Specifically, the question asked in this paper is, Why has the economic transition in Poland been more